Detect unsafe tarfile extract calls#1457
Open
0xTaoZ wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
tarfile.extract()calls in B202 in addition toextractall()extractall(members=...)andfilter="data"behavior intactRoot cause
B202 only matched call names containing
extractall, so an unsafeTarFile.extract(member, path=...)call was skipped even though it trusts archive member paths and can expose the same CWE-22 path traversal risk.Validation
python -m unittest tests.functional.test_functional -k tarfilepython -m unittest tests.functional.test_functionalpython -m flake8 bandit/plugins/tarfile_unsafe_members.py tests/functional/test_functional.py examples/tarfile_extractall.pypython -m bandit -q -r examples/tarfile_extractall.py -t B202 -f jsonResolves #1392